https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264865 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore dismissed the appeals due to a delay of 325 days in filing them, beyond the statutory period. The appellant's explanation attributing the delay to an employee's maternity leave was deemed inadequate. The Tribunal emphasized the need for strong justifications for condoning delays, citing precedents where delays were not excused for insufficient explanations. The decision underscores the significance of adhering to statutory timelines in legal matters, leading to the rejection of the condonation of delay applications and the dismissal of the appeals as time-barred. en-us Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 04 Oct 2015 12:34:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264865 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore dismissed the appeals due to a delay of 325 days in filing them, beyond the statutory period. The appellant's explanation attributing the delay to an employee's maternity leave was deemed inadequate. The Tribunal emphasized the need for strong justifications for condoning delays, citing precedents where delays were not excused for insufficient explanations. The decision underscores the significance of adhering to statutory timelines in legal matters, leading to the rejection of the condonation of delay applications and the dismissal of the appeals as time-barred. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264865