https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264853 The Tribunal found that the fabricated tanks by the appellant, used for transporting LPG gas, were correctly classified under Chapter Heading 87.04 as motor vehicles for transport of goods. Referring to Circular No. 2/89, the Tribunal held the appellant eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E., setting aside the demand for differential duty raised by Revenue authorities. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, with the impugned order confirming the demands being set aside. The judgment was pronounced on 6-1-2015 by the Tribunal in Mumbai, with Members Shri M.V. Ravindran and P.K. Jain presiding. en-us Tue, 06 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 04 Oct 2015 19:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264853 The Tribunal found that the fabricated tanks by the appellant, used for transporting LPG gas, were correctly classified under Chapter Heading 87.04 as motor vehicles for transport of goods. Referring to Circular No. 2/89, the Tribunal held the appellant eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E., setting aside the demand for differential duty raised by Revenue authorities. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, with the impugned order confirming the demands being set aside. The judgment was pronounced on 6-1-2015 by the Tribunal in Mumbai, with Members Shri M.V. Ravindran and P.K. Jain presiding. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264853