https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174232 Section 3 of the Railways Act, 1989 treats efficient administration as the governing criterion for creating railway zones, and the Supreme Court held that such policy choices attract only limited judicial review. Because the decision was supported by committee reports, Cabinet notes, workload data, accessibility norms and other operational material, the Court found no basis to characterise it as arbitrary, irrational, mala fide or otherwise unlawful. The challenge to the formation of the railway zones was therefore rejected, and the governmental policy decision was upheld. en-us Thu, 13 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:17:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174232 Section 3 of the Railways Act, 1989 treats efficient administration as the governing criterion for creating railway zones, and the Supreme Court held that such policy choices attract only limited judicial review. Because the decision was supported by committee reports, Cabinet notes, workload data, accessibility norms and other operational material, the Court found no basis to characterise it as arbitrary, irrational, mala fide or otherwise unlawful. The challenge to the formation of the railway zones was therefore rejected, and the governmental policy decision was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174232