<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 459 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174228</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the retrospective application of Section 31A of the Wakf Act, 1995, as amended in 2006, deeming a candidate not disqualified for holding an office of profit during the 2003 election to the Delhi Legislative Assembly. The legal fiction created by the provision allowed the candidate&#039;s eligibility despite the prior disqualification, emphasizing the principle of legal fictions in statutory interpretation. The Court dismissed the appeals challenging the disqualification, noting that the High Court&#039;s judgment focused solely on the office of profit issue and declined to address other points raised in the election petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 21:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 459 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174228</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the retrospective application of Section 31A of the Wakf Act, 1995, as amended in 2006, deeming a candidate not disqualified for holding an office of profit during the 2003 election to the Delhi Legislative Assembly. The legal fiction created by the provision allowed the candidate&#039;s eligibility despite the prior disqualification, emphasizing the principle of legal fictions in statutory interpretation. The Court dismissed the appeals challenging the disqualification, noting that the High Court&#039;s judgment focused solely on the office of profit issue and declined to address other points raised in the election petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>