<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 440 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174227</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to disqualify the appellants who were expelled from their party and joined another, confirming that joining another party after expulsion constitutes voluntarily giving up membership of the original party, leading to disqualification under Paragraph 2(1)(a) of the Tenth Schedule. The concept of &quot;unattached&quot; members was deemed to have no recognition in the Tenth Schedule, and the appeals were dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 440 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174227</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to disqualify the appellants who were expelled from their party and joined another, confirming that joining another party after expulsion constitutes voluntarily giving up membership of the original party, leading to disqualification under Paragraph 2(1)(a) of the Tenth Schedule. The concept of &quot;unattached&quot; members was deemed to have no recognition in the Tenth Schedule, and the appeals were dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>