https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174223 The court upheld the Full Bench decision in Velayudhan v. Aishabi, affirming that Explanation II-A to Clause (25) of Section 2 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1964, as amended by Act 17 of 1972, should be interpreted liberally to grant Kudikidappu rights based on continuous occupation during the specified period without the need for proving initial permission. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed. The court directed the Land Tribunal to restore the orders granting Kudikidappu rights to the appellants and determine the purchase price of the properties involved. en-us Wed, 13 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Oct 2015 16:08:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174223 The court upheld the Full Bench decision in Velayudhan v. Aishabi, affirming that Explanation II-A to Clause (25) of Section 2 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1964, as amended by Act 17 of 1972, should be interpreted liberally to grant Kudikidappu rights based on continuous occupation during the specified period without the need for proving initial permission. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed. The court directed the Land Tribunal to restore the orders granting Kudikidappu rights to the appellants and determine the purchase price of the properties involved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174223