<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 328 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174222</link>
    <description>Beneficial tax circulars and Government clarifications issued under the sales tax framework are treated as binding on assessing officers when they clarify the legal position or mitigate statutory rigour. The commentary notes that, where an assessee purchased plant and machinery relying on such directions, the authorities could not ignore the clarification and take a contrary view. Applied to Section 3-G of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, the stated effect was that purchases qualifying under the Government letter and Commissioner&#039;s circular attracted the concessional rate, and the contrary levy under Section 3-G(3) was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 16:01:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 328 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174222</link>
      <description>Beneficial tax circulars and Government clarifications issued under the sales tax framework are treated as binding on assessing officers when they clarify the legal position or mitigate statutory rigour. The commentary notes that, where an assessee purchased plant and machinery relying on such directions, the authorities could not ignore the clarification and take a contrary view. Applied to Section 3-G of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, the stated effect was that purchases qualifying under the Government letter and Commissioner&#039;s circular attracted the concessional rate, and the contrary levy under Section 3-G(3) was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>