https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174222 The Sales Tax Tribunal's order was set aside in a case involving the interpretation of Section 3-G of the U. P. Sales Tax Act. The revision petitions challenged the imposition of additional taxes on a public limited company engaged in sugar manufacturing for alleged misuse of purchased goods. The judgment emphasized the binding nature of government letters and circulars, supporting the revisionist's entitlement to concessional rates under Section 3-G (1). The Tribunal's failure to consider the binding nature of the circulars led to the allowance of the revision petitions, annulling the assessing officer's tax imposition under Section 3-G (3) for the revisionist. en-us Fri, 23 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Oct 2015 16:01:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174222 The Sales Tax Tribunal's order was set aside in a case involving the interpretation of Section 3-G of the U. P. Sales Tax Act. The revision petitions challenged the imposition of additional taxes on a public limited company engaged in sugar manufacturing for alleged misuse of purchased goods. The judgment emphasized the binding nature of government letters and circulars, supporting the revisionist's entitlement to concessional rates under Section 3-G (1). The Tribunal's failure to consider the binding nature of the circulars led to the allowance of the revision petitions, annulling the assessing officer's tax imposition under Section 3-G (3) for the revisionist. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 23 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174222