<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (2) TMI 128 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174219</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s decision that the decree for eviction was null and void due to the retrospective application of the proviso to section 3 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The Act applied to the tenancy in question, rendering the civil court&#039;s decree for eviction invalid. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the respondent was ordered to pay arrears of rent in specified installments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:42:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (2) TMI 128 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174219</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s decision that the decree for eviction was null and void due to the retrospective application of the proviso to section 3 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The Act applied to the tenancy in question, rendering the civil court&#039;s decree for eviction invalid. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the respondent was ordered to pay arrears of rent in specified installments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>