<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1032 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174216</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant regarding the availing of CENVAT Credit for clearing furnace oil under the &quot;Served from India Scheme.&quot; It held that the Appellant was not obligated to pay an amount under Rule 6(1) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, as the clearance of goods at a Nil rate of duty did not constitute an exemption. The Tribunal set aside the order demanding payment and penalties, allowing the appeal and providing consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:32:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1032 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174216</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant regarding the availing of CENVAT Credit for clearing furnace oil under the &quot;Served from India Scheme.&quot; It held that the Appellant was not obligated to pay an amount under Rule 6(1) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, as the clearance of goods at a Nil rate of duty did not constitute an exemption. The Tribunal set aside the order demanding payment and penalties, allowing the appeal and providing consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>