<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (4) TMI 97 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174214</link>
    <description>The court interpreted Section 4 of the U. P. Zamindars&#039; Debt Reduction Act, 1952, focusing on an amendment removing &quot;charged under the decree.&quot; The judgment emphasized the amendment&#039;s intent to aid mortgaged property within the Act, requiring the property to be from the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The court addressed a review application post the 1962 amendment, stating a change in law can justify review. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court&#039;s relief to debtors under the amended provisions. Each party bore their costs, with the appeal rejected based on the amended law&#039;s application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:17:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (4) TMI 97 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174214</link>
      <description>The court interpreted Section 4 of the U. P. Zamindars&#039; Debt Reduction Act, 1952, focusing on an amendment removing &quot;charged under the decree.&quot; The judgment emphasized the amendment&#039;s intent to aid mortgaged property within the Act, requiring the property to be from the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The court addressed a review application post the 1962 amendment, stating a change in law can justify review. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court&#039;s relief to debtors under the amended provisions. Each party bore their costs, with the appeal rejected based on the amended law&#039;s application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>