https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174213 The court directed the first respondent to address the appeals filed by the importer within three months, clarifying that duty should not be based on the value shown in the Bill of Entry for future transactions. The importer was instructed to challenge classification and duty quantification through the appeal process if aggrieved by the actions of the second respondent. The court disposed of the Writ Petition, emphasizing adherence to the appeal process for resolving classification and duty disputes. en-us Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Dec 2015 14:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174213 The court directed the first respondent to address the appeals filed by the importer within three months, clarifying that duty should not be based on the value shown in the Bill of Entry for future transactions. The importer was instructed to challenge classification and duty quantification through the appeal process if aggrieved by the actions of the second respondent. The court disposed of the Writ Petition, emphasizing adherence to the appeal process for resolving classification and duty disputes. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174213