<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1070 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174207</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions related to assessment years 2000-2001, 2001-2002, and 2002-2003, directing the Additional Commissioner to resolve pending appeals without pre-deposit within three months. For the assessment year 2005-2006, the petitioner could file objections under Section 74 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act within six weeks. The court emphasized the doctrine of post decisionsal hearing, granting the petitioner the opportunity to appeal without pre-deposit if objections were rejected. The court set aside a penalty order imposed without a hearing, remitting the matter for proper decision-making with a hearing opportunity. No costs were imposed on either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1070 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174207</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions related to assessment years 2000-2001, 2001-2002, and 2002-2003, directing the Additional Commissioner to resolve pending appeals without pre-deposit within three months. For the assessment year 2005-2006, the petitioner could file objections under Section 74 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act within six weeks. The court emphasized the doctrine of post decisionsal hearing, granting the petitioner the opportunity to appeal without pre-deposit if objections were rejected. The court set aside a penalty order imposed without a hearing, remitting the matter for proper decision-making with a hearing opportunity. No costs were imposed on either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>