<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 381 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174202</link>
    <description>A nationalised bank constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 was treated as a corporation formed in pursuance of a special Indian law within section 4(e) of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Agriculturists Relief Act IV of 1938. The Court held that &quot;special Indian law&quot; means a law enacted by the Indian Legislature, and that a corporation created by or under such a law is covered by section 4(e). As a result, the bank&#039;s debt was outside the scaling-down relief under section 13, the Article 14 challenge failed, and the decree could not be reduced on the basis of agriculturists&#039; debt relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 12:32:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 381 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174202</link>
      <description>A nationalised bank constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 was treated as a corporation formed in pursuance of a special Indian law within section 4(e) of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Agriculturists Relief Act IV of 1938. The Court held that &quot;special Indian law&quot; means a law enacted by the Indian Legislature, and that a corporation created by or under such a law is covered by section 4(e). As a result, the bank&#039;s debt was outside the scaling-down relief under section 13, the Article 14 challenge failed, and the decree could not be reduced on the basis of agriculturists&#039; debt relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>