<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (9) TMI 144 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174200</link>
    <description>The appeals by the State Government were dismissed. The court held that the power to transfer District Judges falls under the control vested in the High Court, consultation under Articles 233 and 235 is mandatory, and remarks critical of the Government did not warrant expunction. The judgment emphasizes the constitutional mandate for the High Court&#039;s authority over judicial appointments and transfers, ensuring judicial independence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 12:17:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (9) TMI 144 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174200</link>
      <description>The appeals by the State Government were dismissed. The court held that the power to transfer District Judges falls under the control vested in the High Court, consultation under Articles 233 and 235 is mandatory, and remarks critical of the Government did not warrant expunction. The judgment emphasizes the constitutional mandate for the High Court&#039;s authority over judicial appointments and transfers, ensuring judicial independence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>