<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 112 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264837</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision on merits. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, emphasizing the importance of properly exercising jurisdictional powers in tax matters for a fair decision. The appellant&#039;s tax liability for services provided was confirmed, despite their belief in non-taxability, and penalties were imposed. The Tribunal criticized the Commissioner (Appeals) for not addressing legal arguments, directing a remand for a proper consideration of the classification of services and the appellant&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 11:41:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 112 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264837</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision on merits. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, emphasizing the importance of properly exercising jurisdictional powers in tax matters for a fair decision. The appellant&#039;s tax liability for services provided was confirmed, despite their belief in non-taxability, and penalties were imposed. The Tribunal criticized the Commissioner (Appeals) for not addressing legal arguments, directing a remand for a proper consideration of the classification of services and the appellant&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>