<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 111 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264836</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that appellants must deposit 7.5% of the duty/tax demanded for filing appeals under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regardless of when proceedings commenced. The Tribunal emphasized legislative intent and its limited jurisdiction in interpreting such laws, rejecting the argument that vested rights exempted pre-deposit. Appellants were given 8 weeks to comply with the requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 11:41:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 111 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264836</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that appellants must deposit 7.5% of the duty/tax demanded for filing appeals under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regardless of when proceedings commenced. The Tribunal emphasized legislative intent and its limited jurisdiction in interpreting such laws, rejecting the argument that vested rights exempted pre-deposit. Appellants were given 8 weeks to comply with the requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>