https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264835 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the impugned notices of default assessment and penalty for tax and interest issued beyond the statutory limitation period of 6 years under Section 34 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act. The notices were found to be unsustainable as they were issued after the extended limitation period and not in compliance with the prescribed forms. The writ petition was allowed, and each party was directed to bear their own costs, with all pending applications disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264835 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the impugned notices of default assessment and penalty for tax and interest issued beyond the statutory limitation period of 6 years under Section 34 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act. The notices were found to be unsustainable as they were issued after the extended limitation period and not in compliance with the prescribed forms. The writ petition was allowed, and each party was directed to bear their own costs, with all pending applications disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264835