<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 109 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264834</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the penalty order, Objection Hearing Authority&#039;s decision, and the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s affirmation, remanding the penalty matter back to the Value Added Tax Officer for a fresh decision in compliance with the law. The judgment allowed the appeal without costs, emphasizing the necessity of following procedural fairness and natural justice principles in penalty assessments under the DVAT Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 109 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264834</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the penalty order, Objection Hearing Authority&#039;s decision, and the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s affirmation, remanding the penalty matter back to the Value Added Tax Officer for a fresh decision in compliance with the law. The judgment allowed the appeal without costs, emphasizing the necessity of following procedural fairness and natural justice principles in penalty assessments under the DVAT Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>