<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 102 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264827</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, permitting remission for work-in-progress and intermediate products while upholding duty demand for raw materials and packing materials. The penalty under Section 11AC was set aside due to the absence of deliberate evasion. The appellant was granted consequential benefits as indicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 11:40:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 102 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264827</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, permitting remission for work-in-progress and intermediate products while upholding duty demand for raw materials and packing materials. The penalty under Section 11AC was set aside due to the absence of deliberate evasion. The appellant was granted consequential benefits as indicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>