https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264812 The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer, citing genuine payments to reduce land cost supported by evidence. The Tribunal found the explanations plausible and dismissed the issue as no substantial question of law arose. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the deletion of an amount paid to a specific party, supported by evidence of the transaction being credited by the vendor, leading to a reasonable decision without substantial legal questions. The appeal was admitted solely on the substantial question of law related to the second issue, while the first issue was not entertained. en-us Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264812 The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer, citing genuine payments to reduce land cost supported by evidence. The Tribunal found the explanations plausible and dismissed the issue as no substantial question of law arose. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the deletion of an amount paid to a specific party, supported by evidence of the transaction being credited by the vendor, leading to a reasonable decision without substantial legal questions. The appeal was admitted solely on the substantial question of law related to the second issue, while the first issue was not entertained. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264812