<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 84 - KERLA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264809</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the order dismissing the delay condonation petition and directed the assessing authority to reevaluate the condonation application within two months, following Supreme Court guidelines. The court emphasized that delay should be condoned when a claim is legally sustainable, prioritizing substantial justice over technicalities. Factors like conduct, prejudice, and lack of bona fides are crucial in such decisions. The court ordered a stay on recovery proceedings until the reassessment is completed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 13:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 84 - KERLA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264809</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the order dismissing the delay condonation petition and directed the assessing authority to reevaluate the condonation application within two months, following Supreme Court guidelines. The court emphasized that delay should be condoned when a claim is legally sustainable, prioritizing substantial justice over technicalities. Factors like conduct, prejudice, and lack of bona fides are crucial in such decisions. The court ordered a stay on recovery proceedings until the reassessment is completed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>