<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 68 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264793</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that section 40(a)(ia) does not apply to cases of short deduction of tax, distinguishing it from section 201(1A) which allows for interest on undeducted amounts. The judgment highlighted the importance of differentiating between non-deduction and short deduction of tax, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 11:37:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 68 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264793</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that section 40(a)(ia) does not apply to cases of short deduction of tax, distinguishing it from section 201(1A) which allows for interest on undeducted amounts. The judgment highlighted the importance of differentiating between non-deduction and short deduction of tax, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>