<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Orders Re-adjudication Due to Lack of Notice on Recoverable Interest in Refund Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25062</link>
    <description>Adjustment of interest amount with the refund - Even if the interest amount was recoverable from the appellant, the appellant should at least have been intimated about the same, but from the records it appears there was no such intimation to the appellant - matter to be re-adjudicated - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2015 23:35:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2015 23:35:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Orders Re-adjudication Due to Lack of Notice on Recoverable Interest in Refund Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25062</link>
      <description>Adjustment of interest amount with the refund - Even if the interest amount was recoverable from the appellant, the appellant should at least have been intimated about the same, but from the records it appears there was no such intimation to the appellant - matter to be re-adjudicated - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2015 23:35:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>