<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 744 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174174</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the capital nature of the receipts in question based on the public purpose and industrial development objectives behind the incentives provided. The judgment highlights the significance of legal precedents and jurisdictional decisions in determining the tax treatment of specific receipts under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 744 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174174</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the capital nature of the receipts in question based on the public purpose and industrial development objectives behind the incentives provided. The judgment highlights the significance of legal precedents and jurisdictional decisions in determining the tax treatment of specific receipts under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>