https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174163 Review jurisdiction may extend to a judgment where material framed issues were not actually decided or where the court proceeded on a material misconception of counsel's concession. The text also states that a pending review was not rendered infructuous by changes in the State's judicial structure because the existing law and constitutional provisions preserved the High Court's jurisdiction to deal with it. On that basis, failure to determine the validity of the meeting and notice issues, together with deciding matters outside the framed questions, was treated as an error or sufficient analogous ground for review. en-us Fri, 21 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:31:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174163 Review jurisdiction may extend to a judgment where material framed issues were not actually decided or where the court proceeded on a material misconception of counsel's concession. The text also states that a pending review was not rendered infructuous by changes in the State's judicial structure because the existing law and constitutional provisions preserved the High Court's jurisdiction to deal with it. On that basis, failure to determine the validity of the meeting and notice issues, together with deciding matters outside the framed questions, was treated as an error or sufficient analogous ground for review. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174163