<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 912 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174161</link>
    <description>SC reviewed a petition challenging its previous order quashing an FIR against a political figure related to disproportionate assets. Applying Article 137, the Court reaffirmed its original judgment, holding that the CBI exceeded its investigative mandate. The review petition was dismissed, emphasizing that review jurisdiction is narrow and cannot be used to re-argue settled legal points.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 17:12:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 912 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174161</link>
      <description>SC reviewed a petition challenging its previous order quashing an FIR against a political figure related to disproportionate assets. Applying Article 137, the Court reaffirmed its original judgment, holding that the CBI exceeded its investigative mandate. The review petition was dismissed, emphasizing that review jurisdiction is narrow and cannot be used to re-argue settled legal points.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>