<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 59 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264784</link>
    <description>Where a substantial portion of the disputed service tax demand and some interest had already been paid, and the dispute appeared arguable, the Tribunal treated further pre-deposit as unnecessary and stayed recovery of the balance during the appeal. On limitation, it noted that a departmental circular clarifying taxability of commission received by dealers from banks and NBFCs indicated genuine uncertainty during the relevant period, so the extended period was not prima facie invocable and the limitation objection remained arguable in favour of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2015 23:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 59 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264784</link>
      <description>Where a substantial portion of the disputed service tax demand and some interest had already been paid, and the dispute appeared arguable, the Tribunal treated further pre-deposit as unnecessary and stayed recovery of the balance during the appeal. On limitation, it noted that a departmental circular clarifying taxability of commission received by dealers from banks and NBFCs indicated genuine uncertainty during the relevant period, so the extended period was not prima facie invocable and the limitation objection remained arguable in favour of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>