<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 50 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264775</link>
    <description>The Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court remanded the case for fresh adjudication regarding the liability of the appellants to pay service tax for transporting goods internationally. The court found that the Commissioner had not adequately considered the appellants&#039; arguments and failed to properly assess whether their activities fell under the definition of &#039;courier service.&#039; Emphasizing the need for a comprehensive reassessment, the tribunal granted the appellants an opportunity to present their case effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 11:59:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 50 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264775</link>
      <description>The Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court remanded the case for fresh adjudication regarding the liability of the appellants to pay service tax for transporting goods internationally. The court found that the Commissioner had not adequately considered the appellants&#039; arguments and failed to properly assess whether their activities fell under the definition of &#039;courier service.&#039; Emphasizing the need for a comprehensive reassessment, the tribunal granted the appellants an opportunity to present their case effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>