https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264764 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the lack of sustainable evidence for wilful misstatement or suppression by the appellant regarding duty evasion through diesel usage for electricity generation. The appellant's procurement of more duty-paid diesel than necessary for colony electricity generation was noted, with the Tribunal criticizing the Revenue's approach as untenable. The judgment favored the appellant, concluding the legal proceedings on a specific date. en-us Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Oct 2015 23:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264764 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the lack of sustainable evidence for wilful misstatement or suppression by the appellant regarding duty evasion through diesel usage for electricity generation. The appellant's procurement of more duty-paid diesel than necessary for colony electricity generation was noted, with the Tribunal criticizing the Revenue's approach as untenable. The judgment favored the appellant, concluding the legal proceedings on a specific date. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264764