<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 22 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264747</link>
    <description>The Court held that the expenditure on interest claimed by the Assessee was allowable under Section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It directed the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer and allowed the netting of interest paid on the borrowed sum against interest income earned. The impugned order of the ITAT was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with no orders as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 22 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264747</link>
      <description>The Court held that the expenditure on interest claimed by the Assessee was allowable under Section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It directed the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer and allowed the netting of interest paid on the borrowed sum against interest income earned. The impugned order of the ITAT was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with no orders as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>