<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 20 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order directing the reversal of Cenvat credit on inputs in unmarketable finished goods for cable manufacturers. The appellants successfully argued that the circular relied upon did not apply to their situation, as they did not receive compensation for the loss and the duty remission was granted under Central Excise Rules. The Tribunal found the reversal unjust as the appellants did not wrongly avail the credit, ultimately allowing the appeal in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 20 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order directing the reversal of Cenvat credit on inputs in unmarketable finished goods for cable manufacturers. The appellants successfully argued that the circular relied upon did not apply to their situation, as they did not receive compensation for the loss and the duty remission was granted under Central Excise Rules. The Tribunal found the reversal unjust as the appellants did not wrongly avail the credit, ultimately allowing the appeal in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>