<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 13 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264738</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of the provision for doubtful advance as it had already been added back by the assessee. Regarding the carry forward business loss, the Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to verify the period up to which the loss could be carried forward, emphasizing proper assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 11:56:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 13 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264738</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of the provision for doubtful advance as it had already been added back by the assessee. Regarding the carry forward business loss, the Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to verify the period up to which the loss could be carried forward, emphasizing proper assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>