<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264726</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions for interest-free advances, purchases at higher rates, bank charges, and capital nature expenditures treated as revenue expenditures. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, citing consistency with previous rulings on similar issues in earlier assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 11:55:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264726</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions for interest-free advances, purchases at higher rates, bank charges, and capital nature expenditures treated as revenue expenditures. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, citing consistency with previous rulings on similar issues in earlier assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>