<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 28 -  CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=497</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on inputs used in finished goods destroyed by fire need not be reversed where remission of duty has already been granted on the damaged goods. The applicable Board Circular for the relevant period supported retention of the credit, because it clarified that destruction or damage of finished goods in fire does not require reversal of input credit. The departmental circular relied on was from a later period and did not govern the dispute. The denial of Cenvat credit was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to retain the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 28 -  CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=497</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on inputs used in finished goods destroyed by fire need not be reversed where remission of duty has already been granted on the damaged goods. The applicable Board Circular for the relevant period supported retention of the credit, because it clarified that destruction or damage of finished goods in fire does not require reversal of input credit. The departmental circular relied on was from a later period and did not govern the dispute. The denial of Cenvat credit was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to retain the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>