<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 591 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174151</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty u/s 271E, ruling that the repayment in cash exceeding Rs. 20,000 was due to advances received for business purposes, not constituting a loan or deposit under section 269T. The Tribunal found a reasonable cause for the cash repayment, based on commercial expediency, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:41:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 591 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174151</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty u/s 271E, ruling that the repayment in cash exceeding Rs. 20,000 was due to advances received for business purposes, not constituting a loan or deposit under section 269T. The Tribunal found a reasonable cause for the cash repayment, based on commercial expediency, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>