https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174149 The High Court held that no substantial question of law arose because the core issue had already been conclusively settled by a binding Supreme Court precedent. As the Tribunal's decision was consistent with that controlling authority, the appellate court found nothing fresh for adjudication and declined to entertain the question framed in the memorandum of appeal. The appeal was dismissed, with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:07:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174149 The High Court held that no substantial question of law arose because the core issue had already been conclusively settled by a binding Supreme Court precedent. As the Tribunal's decision was consistent with that controlling authority, the appellate court found nothing fresh for adjudication and declined to entertain the question framed in the memorandum of appeal. The appeal was dismissed, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174149