https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174143 Section 313 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 does not create a deemed sanction for a lay-out plan merely because the Standing Committee fails to act within sixty days; the time limit is a promptness requirement, not a statutory fiction of approval. The provision was contrasted with other sanctioning schemes where deemed consequences are expressly provided, showing that automatic approval was not intended. A revised lay-out plan is also maintainable after an original plan has been sanctioned and utilisation of land has begun, because a revised proposal is a fresh plan that must be examined on its own statutory merits and may be refused only on grounds recognised by section 313(4). en-us Wed, 05 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2017 17:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174143 Section 313 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 does not create a deemed sanction for a lay-out plan merely because the Standing Committee fails to act within sixty days; the time limit is a promptness requirement, not a statutory fiction of approval. The provision was contrasted with other sanctioning schemes where deemed consequences are expressly provided, showing that automatic approval was not intended. A revised lay-out plan is also maintainable after an original plan has been sanctioned and utilisation of land has begun, because a revised proposal is a fresh plan that must be examined on its own statutory merits and may be refused only on grounds recognised by section 313(4). Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174143