https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174143 The Supreme Court clarified that the failure of the Standing Committee to consider an application for sanction to a lay-out plan within the specified period does not result in a "deemed" grant of sanction. The Court held that the statutory provisions do not imply automatic sanction upon non-compliance. Additionally, the Court ruled that Section 313 applies to revised lay-out plans, allowing owners to apply for sanction to revised plans even after utilizing the land. The Court emphasized that the Standing Committee must consider applications within the prescribed timeframe but did not establish deemed sanction for non-compliance. The Court directed the Municipal Corporation to expedite the pending application without granting further relief to the appellant. en-us Wed, 05 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2017 17:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174143 The Supreme Court clarified that the failure of the Standing Committee to consider an application for sanction to a lay-out plan within the specified period does not result in a "deemed" grant of sanction. The Court held that the statutory provisions do not imply automatic sanction upon non-compliance. Additionally, the Court ruled that Section 313 applies to revised lay-out plans, allowing owners to apply for sanction to revised plans even after utilizing the land. The Court emphasized that the Standing Committee must consider applications within the prescribed timeframe but did not establish deemed sanction for non-compliance. The Court directed the Municipal Corporation to expedite the pending application without granting further relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174143