https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174141 The Supreme Court ruled that disciplinary action can be taken against an employee for gross negligence in quasi-judicial functions, even without proving an ulterior motive. Citing precedent cases, the Court outlined instances where disciplinary action is warranted, including negligence or omission of statutory conditions. Emphasizing the importance of following established law, the Court set aside decisions contrary to the precedent case law and upheld the punishment order for the respondent without costs. en-us Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174141 The Supreme Court ruled that disciplinary action can be taken against an employee for gross negligence in quasi-judicial functions, even without proving an ulterior motive. Citing precedent cases, the Court outlined instances where disciplinary action is warranted, including negligence or omission of statutory conditions. Emphasizing the importance of following established law, the Court set aside decisions contrary to the precedent case law and upheld the punishment order for the respondent without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174141