https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174138 A second audit report on the same accounts was unsustainable where the first report under Section 63(5) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act had already been acted upon and later audit steps were taken on that basis. The court treated the second report as unnecessary duplication that would create confusion, particularly because proceedings under Sections 64 and 68 could continue from the first report alone. The second audit report was therefore liable to be quashed, and the matter was permitted to proceed in accordance with law on the basis of the first audit report. en-us Tue, 16 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:39:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174138 A second audit report on the same accounts was unsustainable where the first report under Section 63(5) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act had already been acted upon and later audit steps were taken on that basis. The court treated the second report as unnecessary duplication that would create confusion, particularly because proceedings under Sections 64 and 68 could continue from the first report alone. The second audit report was therefore liable to be quashed, and the matter was permitted to proceed in accordance with law on the basis of the first audit report. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174138