<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 481 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174136</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court overturned the Administrative Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside a charge memo issued to an Inspector of Police, emphasizing that the focus at the charge-framing stage should be on whether the charges disclose alleged misconduct, not on their truth. The Court directed the enquiry to proceed within eight months and disciplinary action within three months thereafter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 481 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174136</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court overturned the Administrative Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside a charge memo issued to an Inspector of Police, emphasizing that the focus at the charge-framing stage should be on whether the charges disclose alleged misconduct, not on their truth. The Court directed the enquiry to proceed within eight months and disciplinary action within three months thereafter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>