https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174135 The SC dismissed the appeals, finding no substantial question of law. It upheld the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity's decision, confirming the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's authority on tariff revision and withdrawal of the incentive scheme. The doctrine of promissory estoppel was deemed inapplicable. Costs of Rs. 20,000 per case were imposed on the appellant, payable to the SCBA Lawyers' Welfare Fund within six weeks. en-us Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Nov 2024 09:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174135 The SC dismissed the appeals, finding no substantial question of law. It upheld the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity's decision, confirming the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's authority on tariff revision and withdrawal of the incentive scheme. The doctrine of promissory estoppel was deemed inapplicable. Costs of Rs. 20,000 per case were imposed on the appellant, payable to the SCBA Lawyers' Welfare Fund within six weeks. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174135