<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 642 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174132</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgments and the initial order of withholding increments, directing the Full Court to reconsider the appropriate punishment. The appellant was to be immediately reinstated to the cadre of District Judge with all due monetary benefits. The Court emphasized the need for higher courts to protect judicial officers from frivolous complaints and ensure that disciplinary actions are justified and proportionate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 642 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174132</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgments and the initial order of withholding increments, directing the Full Court to reconsider the appropriate punishment. The appellant was to be immediately reinstated to the cadre of District Judge with all due monetary benefits. The Court emphasized the need for higher courts to protect judicial officers from frivolous complaints and ensure that disciplinary actions are justified and proportionate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>