<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 10 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=492</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the respondents as the valuation of P.C. poles for captive consumption in the transmission of electricity was determined to be reasonable under Rule 11 of the Valuation Rules. The original order assessing the goods at 115% of the cost of production was reinstated, setting aside the impugned order-in-appeal that directed a different assessment method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 10 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=492</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the respondents as the valuation of P.C. poles for captive consumption in the transmission of electricity was determined to be reasonable under Rule 11 of the Valuation Rules. The original order assessing the goods at 115% of the cost of production was reinstated, setting aside the impugned order-in-appeal that directed a different assessment method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>