<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1936 (3) TMI 4 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174126</link>
    <description>A jurisdictional objection to an income-tax assessment had to be raised before the Income-tax Officer at the assessment stage, because the appellate and reference provisions did not extend to the place of assessment; the post-assessment challenge to territorial jurisdiction was therefore not maintainable. A partner&#039;s share in firm profits was exempt only where the firm&#039;s profits had actually been assessed to income-tax, not merely computed. As the firm had not been assessed to tax and had in fact suffered a loss, the claimed exemption failed and the amount was correctly treated as taxable income in the partner&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:28:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1936 (3) TMI 4 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174126</link>
      <description>A jurisdictional objection to an income-tax assessment had to be raised before the Income-tax Officer at the assessment stage, because the appellate and reference provisions did not extend to the place of assessment; the post-assessment challenge to territorial jurisdiction was therefore not maintainable. A partner&#039;s share in firm profits was exempt only where the firm&#039;s profits had actually been assessed to income-tax, not merely computed. As the firm had not been assessed to tax and had in fact suffered a loss, the claimed exemption failed and the amount was correctly treated as taxable income in the partner&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>