<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 526 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174115</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Tribunal erred in applying the highest rate of duty to imported goods classified as &quot;textured yarn produced out of base yarn.&quot; The Court ruled that the goods should be subject to the concessional rate specified in Notification No. 55/78. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the Tribunal&#039;s decision was overturned, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:04:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 526 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174115</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Tribunal erred in applying the highest rate of duty to imported goods classified as &quot;textured yarn produced out of base yarn.&quot; The Court ruled that the goods should be subject to the concessional rate specified in Notification No. 55/78. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the Tribunal&#039;s decision was overturned, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>