<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 296 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174105</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that debts due to the State have priority over other debts, allowing the State to recover tax arrears even after the property has been sold by a third party. The Court set aside the High Court&#039;s decision and restored the Trial Court&#039;s judgment, ruling in favor of the Union of India in the recovery of Income Tax from the sale proceeds, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:28:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 296 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174105</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that debts due to the State have priority over other debts, allowing the State to recover tax arrears even after the property has been sold by a third party. The Court set aside the High Court&#039;s decision and restored the Trial Court&#039;s judgment, ruling in favor of the Union of India in the recovery of Income Tax from the sale proceeds, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>