https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174103 The court held that the appellant was required to reimburse the respondent for the service tax imposed post-bid acceptance as it was not foreseeable at the time of contract formation and the contract did not indicate otherwise. The court emphasized that unless explicitly stated otherwise in the contract, any taxes introduced after bid acceptance should be borne by the party responsible for the tax. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the judgment of the Single Judge. en-us Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:24:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174103 The court held that the appellant was required to reimburse the respondent for the service tax imposed post-bid acceptance as it was not foreseeable at the time of contract formation and the contract did not indicate otherwise. The court emphasized that unless explicitly stated otherwise in the contract, any taxes introduced after bid acceptance should be borne by the party responsible for the tax. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the judgment of the Single Judge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174103