<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 921 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174097</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed applications seeking extension of earlier interim stay orders and continued the stay for six months or until disposal of the appeals, whichever occurred first. The order records allowance of the stay-extension requests without further elaboration. It also allowed the connected miscellaneous applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 921 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174097</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed applications seeking extension of earlier interim stay orders and continued the stay for six months or until disposal of the appeals, whichever occurred first. The order records allowance of the stay-extension requests without further elaboration. It also allowed the connected miscellaneous applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>