https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=487 An order admitting a settlement application is not ordinarily liable to interference in writ jurisdiction merely because the Settlement Commission has not made a final admission-stage finding on full and true disclosure. The requirement of full and true disclosure remains fundamental, but where the Commission cannot reach a firm conclusion on the material then available, it may reserve that issue for determination at final disposal. The Revenue may still challenge the sufficiency and genuineness of the disclosure before final orders are passed. On those facts, the writ challenge was premature and no jurisdictional or legal error was shown to justify interference. en-us Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=487 An order admitting a settlement application is not ordinarily liable to interference in writ jurisdiction merely because the Settlement Commission has not made a final admission-stage finding on full and true disclosure. The requirement of full and true disclosure remains fundamental, but where the Commission cannot reach a firm conclusion on the material then available, it may reserve that issue for determination at final disposal. The Revenue may still challenge the sufficiency and genuineness of the disclosure before final orders are passed. On those facts, the writ challenge was premature and no jurisdictional or legal error was shown to justify interference. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=487