<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1389 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a members&#039; club, stating that entrance fees collected were not subject to service tax as they did not constitute consideration for services. The principle of mutuality was upheld, exempting transactions between the club and its members from taxation. The appellant was granted a refund of the service tax paid, as it was not passed on to members, avoiding unjust enrichment. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1389 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a members&#039; club, stating that entrance fees collected were not subject to service tax as they did not constitute consideration for services. The principle of mutuality was upheld, exempting transactions between the club and its members from taxation. The appellant was granted a refund of the service tax paid, as it was not passed on to members, avoiding unjust enrichment. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>